Dear Reader,
This is a question I hear a lot. Maybe it's rumbling around in your brain.
Organisations run on metrics. It's pretty hard to make the case to improve usability if you can't translate that initiative into UX metrics.
I believe that UX can and should be measured, but it isn't easy. Is there some grand, universal UX metric we can all follow?
The reality is that there is no perfect UX or product metric that all designers can use. In reality, there are many ways to measure UX. So how do we find the right metrics?
Last night, Maria Panagiotidi gave a talk for our monthly meetup called Choosing the Right UX Metrics. In it, she shared some practical ways to find UX metrics. I love what how she defined UX metrics:
That's so good. I want to zoom in on one thing she covered in her talk called the Goals-Signals-Metrics Process developed by Google. If you've never set a UX metric, I think it's a great place to start!
The goals are the big-picture targets for your product team. Goals should always be based on outcomes, not outputs. An output example would be completing 10 cards in a sprint. An output example would be increasing your efficiency at work.
I'd recommend that you start with one goal. These goals are usually well-defined quarterly goals for mature product teams, like increasing adoption by 15%. Startups might have goals like improving sales to break even. Don't make these goals up. Instead, ask your PM what the goals are or facilitate your team in that process.
UX Example: We want to improve the usability of our app
Signals tell you whether you're on the right path toward your goal. Based on customer behaviours, a signal is an early sign of success or failure. Signals can tell you when you're reaching the goal: after using the new feature, a user submits a positive app store review. These signals could tell you that you've failed: a user submits a bug report while using the feature.
These won't be outcomes-based like the goals, so it's ok to have outputs like the user finishes 3 tasks a day. Try to pick 2-3 signals at first.
UX Example:
As you can see, the signals don't have to contain numbers until the next stage, but it's ok if they already sound a bit like metrics. Finding signals can be a fun activity so bring your team in on the action. PMs will be the decision-maker here, so defer to their judgment as they know your product metrics best.
It's finally time to choose the right metrics by translating your signals into measurable criteria. The metrics should reflect a change over time. Avoid selecting "vanity metrics" or counts that always go up, like increasing follower count. Instead, use ratios or percentages over time, like growing followers by 30% every month.
UX Example:
By Q4 2022...
If you want detailed directions to run this process with your team, check out these detailed playbook directions.
We'll post Maria's full talk on our YouTube channel next week. In it, she talks about pairing this G.S.M. with the H.E.A.R.T. framework. It's very inspiring! Until then, Maria was kind enough to share her slides:
If you find them useful, show some love to Maria on Linkedin!
Until next week, look for signals in customer behaviours!
Jeff Humble
Designer & Co-Founder
The Fountain Institute
P.S. We just added a lot of free tools and articles (and even a few memes) to our new Resources Page if you like advanced UX and Product Design stuff!
The Fountain Institute is an independent online school that teaches advanced UX & product skills.
I Bought a Mac Mini to Try OpenClaw, the Most Hyped AI Tool of 2026 by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, You've probably heard of OpenClaw 🦞 by now. 145,000 GitHub stars. Headlines everywhere. "The AI that actually does things." This tool is the O.G. dream of AI...automation, not slop. This was the missing piece to my automation system. I had to try it. So I bought an entry-level, 2024 M4 Mac Mini for €590 (on sale in Germany, but they're reportedly selling out in the U.S.) and spent two days trying...
Why Decisions Feel So Hard Right Nows By Hannah Baker Dear Reader, Over the last few months, I’ve been talking with design and product leaders across very different organizations, large companies, smaller teams, fast-moving environments, and slower ones. And I keep hearing the same thing. Their teams are being asked to make decisions faster than ever, and yet, deciding feels heavier than it used to. Not slower, exactly. Just harder. At first, people often explain this in familiar ways: too...
When Speed Stops Being the Bottleneck by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, Quick question: What happens when the thing that used to take 12 weeks now takes 4 days? I've been watching this play out across the industry, and it's wild. Lots of companies aren't sharing their new speeds, but a few are: Code and Theory (an agency that works with Microsoft and Amazon) is building dashboards in 40 minutes that used to take a week. They report cutting time-to-prototype by 75%. Coinbase reports a 2-5x increase...