Essential Tools for Better Prioritization


Essential Tools for Better Prioritization

By Hannah Baker


Dear Reader,

Picture this: You’re sitting in a conference room, surrounded by your team.

The whiteboard is filled with sticky notes, each representing a different feature idea for your next product release.

The room is buzzing with energy, but as the conversation unfolds, you notice a pattern—certain voices dominate the discussion. Popular ideas quickly gain momentum, while quieter team members struggle to have their suggestions heard.

You begin to wonder: How can we ensure that we prioritize the right features, not just the loudest ones?

This scenario is all too common, but there’s a solution. With the right prioritization techniques, you can lead your team to make balanced, informed decisions that reflect the collective wisdom in the room, not just the most vocal opinions.

We’ll explore some essential prioritization methods that can help you do just that, whether you’re in a workshop setting or planning your product roadmap.

Prioritization Activities

Prioritization Matrices

Imagine plotting your tasks on a grid, weighing impact against effort or urgency against importance. Prioritization matrices help you visualize where your resources should be focused.

  • Pros: Visual and structured, balances short-term versus long-term goals.
  • Cons: Can become subjective if not appropriately facilitated.

Examples of Criteria

  • Impact vs. Effort
  • Urgency vs. Importance
  • Value vs. Complexity
  • Risk vs. Reward
  • Effort vs. ROI
  • User Value vs. Effort

ICE (Impact, Confidence, Ease) Scoring

When time is of the essence, ICE scoring provides a quick way to prioritize by evaluating tasks based on impact, confidence, and ease of implementation.

  • Pros: Simple and intuitive, ideal for rapid decision-making.
  • Cons: Subjective ratings can affect accuracy and may oversimplify complex projects.

MoSCoW Method

Prioritize by categorizing tasks into Must-Have, Should-Have, Could-Have, and Won’t-have. The MoSCoW method ensures you focus on what’s genuinely essential for success.

  • Pros: Intuitive and easy to explain, focuses teams on highest-priority tasks.
  • Cons: Can be rigid and may not effectively address task urgency.

RICE (Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort) Scoring

For those who prefer a data-driven approach, RICE scoring helps you prioritize by calculating a score based on reach, impact, confidence, and effort.

  • Pros: Provides an objective, data-driven approach and simplifies decision-making.
  • Cons: Time-consuming, requires accurate data to be effective.

While these four methods are highly effective for prioritizing in workshops, they’re not the only options.

If you focus more on broader product management, you might find that approaches like Kano and WSJF (Weighted Shortest Job First) are better suited to your needs.

3 Ways to Go Pro

Once you’ve chosen a prioritization method, the next step is to refine your approach. Here are three quick tips to make sure you’re getting the most out of your prioritization efforts:

  1. Define Clear Scales

    Instead of simply labeling a feature’s value as "1" for low and "3" for high, be more descriptive—"1" could mean "Helps a few stakeholders with secondary tasks," while "3" could mean "Helps all stakeholders with primary tasks."
    • Impact: This ensures that everyone on the team shares a common understanding of what each score really means.
  2. Customize Scoring Systems

    Take ICE or RICE scoring and tweak it to fit your project's unique needs. For instance, you might decide that "Impact" should focus on user satisfaction or revenue potential.
    • Impact: Customizing the scoring system aligns it with your project’s goals, leading to more relevant prioritization.
  3. Contextualize Your Criteria

    Tailor your criteria to the context of your project. Is time-to-market the most critical factor right now? Or perhaps user engagement is the top priority? Adjust your criteria to reflect these nuances.
    • Impact: Contextualizing criteria ensures that your decisions are based on what’s most important at this stage of your project.

Ready to Try It Out?

Now that you’ve got a toolkit of prioritization techniques and tips, think back to that conference room filled with sticky notes.

Try one of these methods the next time you’re faced with a prioritization challenge, whether in a workshop or during product planning.

Use them to guide your team toward making decisions that are informed, balanced, and aligned with your goals.

Remember, prioritization is about more than just choosing what to do—it’s about making sure you’re focusing on the right things, at the right time, with the right understanding.

And to make these activities even more effective, consider enhancing your facilitation skills, which can significantly improve the outcomes. If you want to learn more, check out this Masterclass on Leading with Facilitation.

Happy prioritizing!


COURSE: Facilitating Workshops
Next course: March 17-April 24, 2025
Master practical techniques to lead effective, problem-solving workshops.
Buy a seat


COURSE: Defining UX Strategy
Available now
Learn to design a winning strategy that aligns design with business
Buy a seat


Until next time!

Hannah Baker
Facilitator & Co-Founder
The Fountain Institute

The Fountain Institute

The Fountain Institute is an independent online school that teaches advanced UX & product skills.

Read more from The Fountain Institute

Designing an AI-Powered Automation System by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, This week, I want to share something I use behind the scenes. I want to share something very nerdy that I've been working on 🤓 It's an automation system that I'm using to experiment with AI. If you've ever used a tool like Zapier, then you might like this sort of thing. I built it with Discord and Activepieces, and it's completely free. It looks like this: Here are some of the use cases: Work Automation - a productivity...

Women Kicking over a ladder

Leadership Isn’t a Ladder—It’s a Leap By Hannah Baker Dear Reader, Most people think of leadership as a ladder: start as an individual contributor (IC), climb step by step, and eventually land at the top. My journey was far from that. I never had a traditional design job or a managerial title handed to me. Instead, I jumped straight into founding and leading a business—without a roadmap, a role model, or even a clear sense of what leadership was supposed to look like. It wasn’t always smooth....

Every 2024 Newsletter You Missed by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, It's that time of the year again! Here are all the newsletters you missed in 2024 from the Fountain Institute: A Designer's Uncertain Path to Success Design Strategy vs. Design Vision: What's the difference? Is Poor Communication Hindering Your Projects? Balancing Freelance Life with Maya McBeath Innovation by Design with Cristina Colosi Shaping the Future of the Guild of Working Designers Figma Skills Won't Get You Promoted See...