Dear Reader,
Imagine your boss walks into the room and says:
You don't want to rely on recent memory alone when answering a big question like that. If you're doing Continuous Research (learn more here), you're talking to users every week, and that's a lot to remember.
Your brain is not a recording device, and humans have a tendency to favor recent events over historical events. (known as Recency Bias).
How do you provide categorized qualitative evidence that takes multiple users into account? You can't rely on the memory of your researchers.
You're going to need to do some work to make your data more useful and searchable. Luckily, there is a model for organizing research called Atomic Research.
Atomic Research provides a model to help you categorize qualitative information. It breaks the learning down into "atoms" smaller than a research report and, ultimately, more valuable.
After breaking the qualitative learning down, you get these searchable atoms or "nuggets" built around your research insights.
You might recognize a similar approach to Brad Frost's approach for design systems called Atomic Design. It's the same approach, but it's applied to research instead.
Once the findings are broken down, they should be tagged and organized in a wiki or research repository (think Dovetail or even Notion) to inform future work, not just the current project.
These atoms can then be re-tested or combined with other atoms to form evidence for a new solution. This encourages more evidence-based research.
We live in a searchable age. If your UX data isn't findable, you might find that your research isn't as valuable as it could be.
Today, the world is drowning in data. You can easily find numbers for any aspect of a business.
While Companies are crunching the numbers and figuring out the what with quantitative data, they're missing out on the why. That's where qualitative UX research can help.
But if it only lives in the memory of researchers, it's not going to help. Atomic Research is a tool to help you democratize research.
MINI-COURSE: Facilitative Leadership COURSE: Defining UX Strategy |
Until next week, check if the Atomic Research Model can help you organize your research data.
Jeff Humble
Designer & Co-Founder
The Fountain Institute
P.S. We've got a whole class dedicated to Atomic Research in our UX Research course starting next week. Get a preview of the content in this FREE 60-minute masterclass
The Fountain Institute is an independent online school that teaches advanced UX & product skills.
Monetizing at the Cost of the User Experience by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, Companies don't like to consider how customers can be annoyed by monetization. Companies are always looking for ways to monetize their assets. Even attention is monetized these days. As we'll see in two examples, monetization can make or break the user experience. Monetizing Fail: Yahoo’s Decline (1990s-2010s) Yahoo used to be the tech darling of the internet, much like Google or OpenAI is today. The company had humble...
How to Build Comfort with Ambiguity By Hannah Baker Dear Reader, You're expected to lead even when you have no idea what the hell is going on. (I know, you’ve heard the next part a million times. Bear with me.) The world is moving faster than ever. Technologies shift overnight. Markets pivot on a dime. And somehow, you’re still just trying to get everyone to show up to the team meeting. We all know this, we’re surrounded by it. The speed, the volatility, the endless flood of decisions....
When Hype Comes Before User Insight by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, Have you ever seen a hyped-up product that felt worthless? Today I want to tell you a tale of two companies and how they handled user demand. One took a hype-based approach, trying to create demand, while the other achieved real demand (and hype) through user insights. Hype-First Failure: Quibi (2020) On its surface, Quibi made perfect sense to investors in 2020. The idea was to create Hollywood-quality ten-minute movies and...