Dear Reader,
Imagine your boss walks into the room and says:
You don't want to rely on recent memory alone when answering a big question like that. If you're doing Continuous Research (learn more here), you're talking to users every week, and that's a lot to remember.
Your brain is not a recording device, and humans have a tendency to favor recent events over historical events. (known as Recency Bias).
How do you provide categorized qualitative evidence that takes multiple users into account? You can't rely on the memory of your researchers.
You're going to need to do some work to make your data more useful and searchable. Luckily, there is a model for organizing research called Atomic Research.
Atomic Research provides a model to help you categorize qualitative information. It breaks the learning down into "atoms" smaller than a research report and, ultimately, more valuable.
After breaking the qualitative learning down, you get these searchable atoms or "nuggets" built around your research insights.
You might recognize a similar approach to Brad Frost's approach for design systems called Atomic Design. It's the same approach, but it's applied to research instead.
Once the findings are broken down, they should be tagged and organized in a wiki or research repository (think Dovetail or even Notion) to inform future work, not just the current project.
These atoms can then be re-tested or combined with other atoms to form evidence for a new solution. This encourages more evidence-based research.
We live in a searchable age. If your UX data isn't findable, you might find that your research isn't as valuable as it could be.
Today, the world is drowning in data. You can easily find numbers for any aspect of a business.
While Companies are crunching the numbers and figuring out the what with quantitative data, they're missing out on the why. That's where qualitative UX research can help.
But if it only lives in the memory of researchers, it's not going to help. Atomic Research is a tool to help you democratize research.
|
COURSE: Facilitating Workshops COURSE: Defining UX Strategy |
Until next week, check if the Atomic Research Model can help you organize your research data.
Jeff Humble
Designer & Co-Founder
The Fountain Institute
P.S. We've got a whole class dedicated to Atomic Research in our UX Research course starting next week. Get a preview of the content in this FREE 60-minute masterclass
The Fountain Institute is an independent online school that teaches advanced UX & product skills.
The brief that keeps changing By Hannah Baker Dear Reader, There’s a particular kind of exhaustion I keep hearing about. It’s not burnout, exactly. It’s not being overworked. It’s something more specific, the feeling of being asked to plan something when the thing you’re planning for keeps shifting underneath you. I’ve been hearing it a lot lately. And more and more, it has AI somewhere in the middle of it. Here’s a version of a situation I keep encountering. Someone is working on two large...
OpenClaw Part 2: The 🦞 didn't replace Claude. It made me laugh instead. by Jeff Humble Dear Designer, In Part 1, I spent €590 on a Mac Mini, two days in Terminal, and $3.14 in API tokens I didn't mean to burn. I ended with a list of seven things I was going to automate with my OpenClaw agent 🦞. I only got to one of them. Getting an AI agent from zero to useful takes longer than any article will tell you. Most of the time since then has gone into figuring out how to make it reliable, not into...
The System You Can't See By Hannah Baker Dear Reader, Here's a question I get more than any other: "How do I handle the person who talks too much?" Or the flip side: "How do I get quiet people to speak up?" And every time, I want to say: you're asking the wrong question. Not because those moments aren't real or frustrating. They are. But because treating them as people problems is like looking at algae blooming in a pond and asking, "how do I fix the algae?" You don't. The algae isn't the...