by Jeff Humble
Dear Reader,
Here's a common scenario you might find yourself in:
Somebody in leadership has been pushing for an idea for a long time, and your team finally gets a chance to tackle it. You want to do this by the books, so you design three versions and run a usability test with five users.
You catch some problems early and start feeling pretty confident in your approach. The executives love the design, so everyone is happy.
The idea is finally built, but customers completely ignore it.
It never gains traction, but nobody knows why. Eventually, the leader realizes the idea is a dud and blames the team's execution for the result.
🤦🏽♀️ What happened here?
You skipped the desirability test.
Usability should have been the last thing you tested.
Rather than validating an idea, you want to put an idea through 4 different validation checks. Here are they are in the most common order:
Generally, you will go in that order, meaning usability is the final check and not as crucial as desirability. That might come as a shock to you if you're not aware of the whole process.
Desirability and usability are challenging because they are risks related to people, and people change. What was desirable five years ago may not necessarily be desirable today.
That's why testing is a full-time job. There are always risks related to desirability and usability. Very few designers can test for both.
Testing for desirability is a blind spot for many teams, and it's a good growth role for a senior designer.
Learn more in our four-week course on designing product experiments...only 2 essential seats left!
What methods do you have for testing desirability?
“wErE a FaMiLy HeRe. BrInG yOuR wHoLe SeLf To WoRk.” 🤦🏼♂️ -@tomfall
COURSE: Defining UX Strategy COURSE: Facilitating Workshops |
Until next week, y'all! ✌️
The Fountain Institute is an independent online school that teaches advanced UX & product skills.
5 Signals That Hint at the Future of AI Interactions by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, The AI landscape is changing fast, and the way we interact with AI is changing even faster. Who knows what the UX of AI will be in 2035? Right now, most of us talk to AI through clunky, chat-based interfaces. But new hardware hints at something more human and ambient. Today, I want to share 5 signals: surprising examples from today that suggest where the future might end up, and a method used by future foresight...
When Your Strategy Slides Hit Silence By Hannah Baker Dear Reader, I’ve shared strategy before, and watched it stall. Not because it was wrong. But because the room didn’t know what to do with it. I wasn’t looking for feedback. I wasn’t asking for approval. I was hoping they’d pick it up and run with it. Instead? Confusion. Silence. They didn’t see what I saw. Not because they didn’t care. But because I’d built the strategy, not the on-ramp they needed to step into it. It’s something I’ve...
Let's Talk about Liquid Glass by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, Goodbye, paper-like design. Hello, moving blobs of liquid glass! Play button blunder from Apple Apple's new paradigm in aesthetics is both cool and potentially awful at the same time. "Rather than trying to simply re-create a material from the physical world, Liquid Glass is a new digital meta-material that dynamically bends and shapes light." -Apple Just when you thought skeuomorphism was dead, it rears its realistic head again. I...