Are you stuck in reactive mode?by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, Some designers spend their whole careers reacting to other people's moves. As a design manager, I remember being in this position. I had to brace myself every Monday morning for some radical change in company direction. We never knew what the new agenda would be, but we knew that it would throw our work into chaos. Sometimes, all it took was for the founder to read a single article to change the company agenda. When a competitor released a new feature, the reaction was even worse. Everything had to stop until we figured out how to deal with the competition. The whole company forced the design team to react constantly to changing whims of leadership and the competition. When deadlines, competitors, and continuously changing goals prevent you from doing the necessary design work, you are stuck in Reactive Mode. The reactive mode is a neverending stream of tasks assigned by somebody else. Even design managers can find themselves in this position. The worst part about a reactive mode is that you don't control the speed, so you can't even establish a routine of reacting. This is a very unstrategic position because you will spend all your energy fulfilling other people's orders and never take the time to be proactive or strategic about your design practice. Signs you might be in Reactive Mode
There’s nothing wrong with these reactive approaches on their own. You can follow trends, and it might improve design. I’m just saying that being proactive and company-specific would be way better. “Strategy is about setting yourself apart from the competition. It's not a matter of being better at what you do - it's a matter of being different at what you do.” -Michael Porter The only way to escape the reactive loop is to start being proactive. The Proactive MindsetYou don’t have to design a fancy strategy to be proactive. Katherine Johnson was a NASA mathematician during the Apollo missions. At the time, many women did complex calculations by hand but were not included in critical decision-making processes. Katherine realized that this could have dire consequences during emergencies. She inserted herself into critical conversations and pioneered computer-aided calculations so that her strategic approaches could prevent disasters. Katherine reminds me of many designers I know. She was aware of potential future issues but had to be delicate to help prevent them. Being proactive takes foresight and a strategic mind when you're not a manager, but it is possible! I see students do this every day in my strategy course. It's about designing more unique customer experiences. Being proactive (and strategic) looks like:
The most successful people don’t wait for events to unfold. They design outcomes to their advantage, and strategy provides the tools. It’s uncomfortable to stop reacting. Manufactured urgency, such as arbitrary deadlines, competitive pressures, and stakeholder demands, can keep teams running so hard that they forget why they started running in the first place. Stepping back to think big-picture is necessary to:
In my course on designing strategy, you learn big-picture thinking in six inspiring weeks. You learn how to create a proactive design practice that will prepare you for design leadership positions. And you'll walk away with a strategy that you can use to guide design towards new strategic heights. Now, that would set you apart from the masses of reactive designers.
The Early Bird Sale for Defining UX Strategy expires tomorrow, so jump on the deal to save €300 for the course starting on April 7th.
Until next week! ✌️ |
The Fountain Institute is an independent online school that teaches advanced UX & product skills.
What Can't AI Do in Design in 2026 By Hannah Baker Dear Reader, If you work in design, your feeds are probably saying the same two things on repeat: Here’s everything AI can do for you, and Here’s why you should be terrified. Most of that conversation focuses on tools and job titles: “Will designers be replaced?” “Which roles are safe?” It makes for good headlines, but it’s not how the work actually changes in real life. A few months ago, walking to my studio listening to a Planet Money...
Does the Double Diamond make sense for AI-enabled teams? by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, For twenty years, the Double Diamond has been our north star. Discover, Define, Develop, Deliver. It's elegant. It's teachable. It's in every junior's UX case study. And it made sense…when it was created. All that upfront research made economic sense when coding was the most expensive part of the process. Better to get it right before handoff because it's expensive for engineering to make changes later. But...
When Frameworks Fail and Gut Feelings Take Over By Hannah Baker Dear Reader, You know that moment when the data looks clear, the framework is airtight, and yet something in your stomach says, don’t do it? That’s judgment, the quiet, inconvenient voice that shows up when the evidence has already spoken. It’s also the thing most of us struggle to explain, even though our careers depend on it. Businesses love reasoning. We build frameworks to make decisions look rational, dashboards to make them...