The Fountain Institute is an independent online school that teaches advanced UX & product skills.
Dear Reader,
Today's advice is on a very personal question:
"I don't think that's a good idea," says the project manager, dismissing your work with a wave of her hand.
You suspect she's only saying the idea is bad so that she can hit her project deadlines. But it's her opinion against yours.
You know you shouldn't take it personally, but you do.
Your body reacts for you as a tear forms in the bottom of your eye.
Remind yourself of this:
When we make bets on human behavior, we're often wrong. There have been studies that show most ideas are bad.
If most ideas will fail, how do you know which ones will succeed?
It's impossible to predict the future, but it is possible to de-risk an idea.
Today, I want to talk about a culture of experimentation that can help you avoid personal judgments of ideas on your team.
It's a way to do user-centered idea evaluation.
An assumption is something that you accept as true without question or proof. (Cambridge Dictionary)
Instead of arguing about which idea to build, find assumptions hidden within the idea. It's the assumptions that will kill an idea so find them.
Try these questions on stakeholders:
Q: Are we making assumptions that could cause this idea to fail?
Q: What's the riskiest assumption here? How sure are we that this assumption is true? 10%? 90%?
Q: What would it take to test this assumption?
Questions like this help us see the risk in our ideas. It helps avoid a binary "right" or "wrong" mentality.
It's less combative to talk about assumptions rather than ideas.
If you take it personally when your ideas get shot down, the CEO does, too. Listen for the difference in these two examples.
Example without assumptions:
"Hey CEO, can we test your idea to see if it's good or not?"
Example with assumptions:
"Hey CEO, can we run some tests on the riskiest assumptions in your idea?"
Hear the difference?
Assumption Maps are a great place to think about the priority and evidence of assumptions.
If we have an important idea without much evidence, it’s good to find evidence before you build anything.
You might realize you have pretty weak evidence on most of your ideas.
That's where a product experiment like a concept test or a hypothesis-driven design prototype could help.
People sometimes call this approach “data-driven,” “lean,” or “experimental,” but those words don’t do the concept justice.
It's a way to reduce bias and judge ideas objectively with small, scrappy, user-centered evaluations.
You don't need to be a data scientist to design based on user data.
If it’s early in the product design process, an experiment might look like an interview, a card sort, or a survey.
Once you know how to set up a proper experiment, you can stop relying on subjective feelings and let customer behavior decide.
I've noticed that when ideas come from the intern or the junior, they're assumed to be bad and shot down immediately.
But if they come from a CEO or a VP, we grumble and build them anyway.
That's a problem.
It's a problem because users don't care who has the idea. They only want it to work for their lives.
A process is how you save good ideas and ensure you're not biased.
In my career, I've designed dozens of features that were a "good idea" for the company, but the customer didn't find them desirable.
We were so clueless that we didn't even know they were unwanted features until we checked the analytics months after launch. Checking the analytics is a pretty slow, blunt way to check if users like an idea.
You need a process for testing ideas as they come. And instinct or salary is not a good test.
Here's what a process could look like:
A process like this flattens the org and encourages learning from the customer.
And I think that can be a pretty good thing for you.
If ideas evolve from research and experiments, they become something more than "your idea."
They become user-centered ideas.
Read this guide on testing assumptions→
Watch this masterclass on assumption testing→
Take a free course on product experiments→
Until next week!
Jeff Humble
Designer & Co-Founder
The Fountain Institute
P.S. We just announced the next LIVE masterclass: How to Lead with Facilitation. Here's the poster:
RSVP for FREE |
The Fountain Institute is an independent online school that teaches advanced UX & product skills.
Figma Skills Won't Get You Promoted by Jeff Humble Dear Reader, Today's advice letter concerns the design community's fetishization of Figma and how our obsession with tools gives the wrong impression. Let me explain. Everywhere you look, designer dudes are trying to sell you on Figma. Design is so much more than software for drawing rectangles. But still, you click this stuff. It's almost like you think that learning this one piece of software is the job...rather than, you know, learning how...
Shaping the Future of the Guild of Working Designers - Let's Co-Create! By Hannah Baker Dear Reader, As one of over 6,500 newsletter subscribers, you're part of a vibrant group passionate about senior-level design and leadership. You might have heard us refer to the Guild of Working Designers, or Guild for short, and maybe you're even part of it. But if you've been curious about what this is and why it exists, we are here to clarify that and offer an opportunity to shape its future. The Guild...
Innovation by Design with Cristina Colosi Dear Reader, Last night, we heard an inspiring talk from Cristina Colosi, a service designer working on the innovation team at Rainforest Alliance. Many designers want to get involved in sustainability work, and Cristina is an example of how you can use your design skills to make a real impact on the climate. Cristina gave us a firsthand view of her innovation work with a case study about an NGO that involved farmers, corporations, and the entire...